5 ms·
Because AI operates according to structures that have been designed by human hands. The human mind is incomprehensibly more complex than any AI. So you could ma
by bd 18y ago
Because AI operates according to structures that have been designed by human hands. The human mind is incomprehensibly more complex than any AI. So you could make AI that does innovate, but its innovations would still be far more predictable and routine than any that a human mind could come up with.
Not necessarily. Using evolutionary approach, AI can come up with innovations on par (and possibly even beyond) to what humans could do:
http://www.genetic-programming.com/humancompetitive.html http://www.genetic-programming.com/humancompetitive.html
- likpok 18y agoThe biggest issue with this contention is that no one knows how far AI can go. Furthermore, I posit that there are people who will never accept what AI does, viewing it as always lesser to human development. Someone (I don't remember who) quipped, "What is AI? Whatever a computer can't do".
- gravitycop 18y ago"What is AI? Whatever a computer can't do". One implication seems to be that the human brain is itself not a computer.
- unalone 18y agoIt's not, in the sense that you're talking about. We don't operate through a vast system of yesses and nos. We're not just a huge binary cloud, in other words. And nobody's entirely certain just how we work. Comparing us to computers is really ignoring most of the limitations of computers, and invites far to simplistic - and inaccurate - a comparison.
- gravitycop 18y ago[The human brain is not a computer] in the sense that you're talking about. Is the human brain a machine? 71 hits for: http://blogsearch.google.com?q=%22brain+is+a+machine%22 http://blogsearch.google.com?q=%22brain+is+a+machine%22 8,400 hits for: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22brain+is+a+machine%22 http://www.google.com/search?q=%22brain+is+a+machine%22
- unalone 18y agoOn the same note, 68 results for "government caused 9/11". People blogging doesn't make something a reality.
- gravitycop 18y agoblogging doesn't make something a reality. That implication was not intended. The search links were intended as food for thought.
- unalone 18y agoAh! Gotcha. I think that "human as machine" has some interesting implications, but I think that by the time we make machines as complex and sophisticated as ourselves, they won't be machines any longer. If I see a machine that's organic and that has a superpowerful mind, I won't think it's a machine anymore.
- gravitycop 18y agoI think that by the time we make machines as complex and sophisticated as ourselves Making of wetware was not intended to be implied. If I see a machine that's organic One of these?: http://images.google.com/images?q=flower http://images.google.com/images?q=flower Was that a Yes or a No?