3 ms·
> Genuine counter-movements (e.g. grassroot preferences) might not be as leveraged Then that doesn’t seem like a (counter) movement. There are also many “gras
by andsoitis 1y ago
> Genuine counter-movements (e.g. grassroot preferences) might not be as leveraged
Then that doesn’t seem like a (counter) movement.
There are also many “grass roots movements” that I don’t like and it doesn’t make them “good” just because they’re “grass roots”.
- none2585 1y agoIn this context grass roots would imply the interests of a group of common people in a democracy (as opposed to the interests of a small group of elites) which ostensibly is the point.
- andsoitis 1y agoI think it is more useful to think of “common people” and “the elites” not as separate categories but rather than phases on a spectrum, especially when you consider very specific interests. I have some shared interested with “the common people” and some with “the elites”.
- Nasrudith 11mo ago"The interests of the common people" is a very dangerous collection of weasel words. The whole damn point of democracy is realizing that you cannot just delegate power to 'better people' and expect them to rule in interest of the common people. Because that is basically exactly what royalists were promising!