4 ms·

Or to offer it under a commercial licence in parallel.

• Jon_Lowtek 10mo ago
  While that is the most common use case for CLAs, it is normally done by contributors granting a very permissive, but not exclusive, license to a legal entity like a company or foundation, in addition to the public license granted to everyone. This is not that. This is not even a license. They want a full transfer of intellectual property ownership. Sure that enables them to use it in a commercial product, but it also enables them to sue if contributors contribute similarly to other projects. Obviously that would create a shit storm, and there is an exception with the public license, but riddle me this: can you legally make similar contributions to multiple projects that have this type of CLA? Let us take a step back and instead look where such terms are more common: employment contracts.
• runiq 10mo ago
  That doesn't require full copyright assignment, though, right?