2 ms·
Well, obviously they will be confused because you jumped from a square of numbers to a bunch of operations. They’d be equally confused if you presented those op
by gjulianm 11mo ago
Well, obviously they will be confused because you jumped from a square of numbers to a bunch of operations. They’d be equally confused if you presented those operations numerically. I am not sure what it is you want to prove with that example. I am also not sure that a child can actually understand what a matrix is if you just show them some numbers (i.e., will they actually understand that a matrix is a linear transformer of vectors and the properties it has just by showing them some numbers?)
- matheme 11mo ago> a bunch of operations. Sorry, the notation is bit confusing. The 'A' here is a matrix.
- gjulianm 11mo agoI know it is a matrix, the notation is not confusing at all. I am saying that the concept of a matrix as a set of numbers arranged in a rectangles and the concept of operations on a matrix are very different things, the confusion will not come from notation.
- matheme 11mo agoYou must be correct, because this interaction is completely devoid of any confusion between the two people attempting to communicate clearly.
- gjulianm 11mo agoI do not have any confusion with the notation, I am confused about what the argument you’re trying to convey with English words.