3 ms·
I am surprised by the comments about GH CI. I first started using CI on GL, then moved to GH and found GH's to let me get things done more easily. It's been ye
by martin-t 11mo ago
I am surprised by the comments about GH CI. I first started using CI on GL, then moved to GH and found GH's to let me get things done more easily.
It's been years through and the ease of doing simple things is not always indicative of difficult things. Often quite the contrary...
- estimator7292 11mo agoEasy and good are radically different things.
- smileybarry 11mo agoFrom what I gather it's that GH Actions is good for easy scenarios: single line building, unit tests, etc. When your CI pipeline starts getting complicated or has a bunch of moving parts, not only do you need to rearchitect parts of it, but you lose a lot of stability.
- ryukoposting 11mo agoBingo. GH Actions is great if you're deploying vanilla web stuff to a vanilla web server. I write firmware. GH Actions is hell.