4 ms·
It's definitely a small sample size, but I have more data on this than any other techniques I've seen out there. I've been overruled once after no hiring a can
by kevin_morrill 14y ago
It's definitely a small sample size, but I have more data on this than any other techniques I've seen out there.
I've been overruled once after no hiring a candidate. Low and behold the same person ended up nearly getting fired 9 months later for the very same issues that came up from this question. They struggled to answer even the simplest questions with one sentence responses.
- phuff 14y agoSo, that's a sample size of 1. Not quite what we would call scientifically rigorous ;). I'm not saying it's not a useful question. I'm just saying, you jump to a whole lot of conclusions that are clearly not based on evidence in your hiring process. That's fine, just be aware that your hiring process is not doing what you're thinking or asserting it's doing.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]