Why does this conflict? Faster people doesn't negate the requirement for building systems that maintain safety in the face of errors. > but it does seem fairly

Why does this conflict? Faster people doesn't negate the requirement for building systems that maintain safety in the face of errors. > but it does seem fairly obvious to me that directly automating things with AI will probably always have substantial risk and you have much more assurance, if you involve AI in the process, using it to develop a traditional automation. Sure but the point is you use it when you don't have the same simple flow. Fixed coding for clear issues, fall back afterwards.