3 ms·
I definitely have to agree. There is nothing more dangerous than plugging some numbers into R, typing t.test(some_numbers) and proclaiming "Hey look at this gre
by Homunculiheaded 14y ago
I definitely have to agree. There is nothing more dangerous than plugging some numbers into R, typing t.test(some_numbers) and proclaiming "Hey look at this great p-value!" without understanding what a p-value is actually telling you.
The most important part of doing statistics right is actually understanding what you're doing, and you're far better off using less powerful tools that you understand than pumping data into fancy functions that you can't really explain.
And more important than just raw number crunching: understanding statistics gives you an improved intuition regarding data. The real value in statistics is the new tools it provides for thinking about problems.
A better solution than "learn R" would be to read through something like Head First Statics and the move on from there to more advanced stuff, and only then start hacking around in R.
- glaugh 14y agoCould not agree more. Most stats tools are so complicated that one spends more time learning/thinking about the logistics of running an analysis ("Should I run a chi-squared or a Fisher's Exact Test? And how do I get it to run?") than about the part that demands real human creativity: thinking through the right questions to ask, biases in the sample, etc. Disclosure/shameless-promotion, I'm the cofounder of https://www.statwing.com https://www.statwing.com, an easy to use stats tool.