3 ms·
> In other words, two out of three ain’t bad; IBM is zero for three. Many others in this thread have pointed out IBM's achievements but regardless, IBM is far
by bodge5000 10mo ago
> In other words, two out of three ain’t bad; IBM is zero for three.
Many others in this thread have pointed out IBM's achievements but regardless, IBM is far from "zero for three".
- mistersquid 10mo ago> Many others in this thread have pointed out IBM's achievements but regardless, IBM is far from "zero for three". I was specifically commenting in the context of this thread.* I was not trying to characterize either IBM or Meta except with reference to the arguments offered by this thread’s ancestors. I understood (and understand) that such scorekeeping of a company as storied as IBM is at best reductive and at worst misrepresentative. * Your reference to “this thread” actually addresses sibling comments to OP (ggggp), not this thread which was started by gggp.