3 ms·

Thanks, your comment has explained this better than the article And it does look like an interesting proposal

• gpderetta 11mo ago
  The article is one-level up where it is both using higher level combinators and the pipe syntax for chaining sender and receivers. I do find that hard to reason as well. My reduction to continuations is, I think, derived form Eric Niebler original presentation where he introduced a prototype of the idea behind sender/receivers.