4 ms·

No they did not. Just a handful of countries are spending close to 5% of their GDP on defense, the rest are doing everything in their power to pay as little as

No they did not. Just a handful of countries are spending close to 5% of their GDP on defense, the rest are doing everything in their power to pay as little as possible.

trinix912 11mo ago
> Just a handful of countries are spending 5% of their GDP on defense Have you even read the comment in full before responding? I'm talking about this part of it: > Percentage of GDP to military spending has been criticized as a bad way to measure how much military spending is done and needed But since you wouldn't get it anyways: The "5% of GDP" is a number that US politicians came up with, seemingly out of nowhere, because they figured they want to boost their military industry. EU countries are already spending that or even more - just look at Ukraine spending by EU countries - but since it's spent on their own domestic defense industry, US politicians don't like it. That's the point. They don't want us spending 5% of the GDP on defense unless we buy their stuff. So here we are.
- n8cpdx 11mo ago
  The 5% number is fudged, much of the increase over 2% comes from civic infrastructure investment. They’re fluffing the numbers. Most EU defense spending isn’t on US equipment (only ~35%); I don’t get where the European victim mentality is coming from here - Europe can and is building up its own defense industry. There’s some Trump nonsense more recently about buy American, but the demands to take security seriously have been going on for nearly 20 years, and have been largely ignored until Ukraine round two.
  - trinix912 11mo ago
    > I don’t get where the European victim mentality is coming from here It’s coming from the fact that we’re already in a difficult time with a slowdown in economy and then get bullied into spending the money we could be using to help our own people on new US weapons. All for Trump to then sign half of Ukraine off to Russia.
    - ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
      Like it or not, the US will the war. They want to do business with Russia, not squabble over a country no one knew existed until 4 years ago.
      - trinix912 11mo ago
        > not squabble over a country no one knew existed until 4 years ago. I think you're really not qualified to say anything about Europe if you didn't know Ukraine existed until 4 years ago.
      - witheredspirit 11mo ago
        So, your argument is that the US wants money no matter if it kills people with cars due to lower safety standards, nor if it gives up on allies and security guarantees the US promised? That just sounds like their greed is what's causing harm.
        ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
        I appreciate that you created a new account just to disagree with me. Anyway, "greed is good".
        witheredspirit 11mo ago
        >just to disagree Ad hominem. I did not create it to disagree with you specifically, your stance is not that unique, as you can see I've replied to similar positions. However, when you admit the quiet part out loud I feel like you have no rebuttal and are fine with the exploitation in favor of money standpoint, which should bring your other standpoints in question if this is your guiding principle.
        ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
        I disagree in your assertion that sarcasm is an “ad hominem” attack.
- ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
  Here, so you get it, as I was a bit wrong: https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/finance/def-exp-2025-en.pdf https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/fin... - page 3. Poland spends 4.5% and that is the highest number, the rest are spending much much less. Tell me again how they're spending more???
  - trinix912 11mo ago
    By sending stuff and people to Ukraine. But that doesn’t end up in the Nato GDP spendings, because it goes through their governments not NATO.
witheredspirit 11mo ago
The 5% GDP deadline is 2035. The 2% by 2024 was met. Not even the US spends 5% of their GDP on defense. Again as I've stated, it's been criticized as a bad goal to use this metric. In actuality, people who push the narrative that Europe is being bankrolled by the US will never be satisfied by any percentage.
LunaSea 11mo ago
> Just a handful of countries are spending 5% of their GDP on defense And the US is not one of them
- ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
  The US spends more than the EU combined. If the US would spend 5% of GDP on defense we would all speak english and drive Suburbans.
  - LunaSea 11mo ago
    So proportionally it's spending less than certain EU countries
    - ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
      Wow, the mental gymnastics needed to conclude that while the US spends more than the whole EU combined is less than certain EU countries. Just wow.

No they did not. Just a handful of countries are spending close to 5% of their GDP on defense, the rest are doing everything in their power to pay as little as possible.

trinix912 11mo ago

> Just a handful of countries are spending 5% of their GDP on defense Have you even read the comment in full before responding? I'm talking about this part of it: > Percentage of GDP to military spending has been criticized as a bad way to measure how much military spending is done and needed But since you wouldn't get it anyways: The "5% of GDP" is a number that US politicians came up with, seemingly out of nowhere, because they figured they want to boost their military industry. EU countries are already spending that or even more - just look at Ukraine spending by EU countries - but since it's spent on their own domestic defense industry, US politicians don't like it. That's the point. They don't want us spending 5% of the GDP on defense unless we buy their stuff. So here we are.

n8cpdx 11mo ago
The 5% number is fudged, much of the increase over 2% comes from civic infrastructure investment. They’re fluffing the numbers. Most EU defense spending isn’t on US equipment (only ~35%); I don’t get where the European victim mentality is coming from here - Europe can and is building up its own defense industry. There’s some Trump nonsense more recently about buy American, but the demands to take security seriously have been going on for nearly 20 years, and have been largely ignored until Ukraine round two.
- trinix912 11mo ago
  > I don’t get where the European victim mentality is coming from here It’s coming from the fact that we’re already in a difficult time with a slowdown in economy and then get bullied into spending the money we could be using to help our own people on new US weapons. All for Trump to then sign half of Ukraine off to Russia.
  - ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
    Like it or not, the US will the war. They want to do business with Russia, not squabble over a country no one knew existed until 4 years ago.
    - trinix912 11mo ago
      > not squabble over a country no one knew existed until 4 years ago. I think you're really not qualified to say anything about Europe if you didn't know Ukraine existed until 4 years ago.
    - witheredspirit 11mo ago
      So, your argument is that the US wants money no matter if it kills people with cars due to lower safety standards, nor if it gives up on allies and security guarantees the US promised? That just sounds like their greed is what's causing harm.
      - ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
        I appreciate that you created a new account just to disagree with me. Anyway, "greed is good".
        witheredspirit 11mo ago
        >just to disagree Ad hominem. I did not create it to disagree with you specifically, your stance is not that unique, as you can see I've replied to similar positions. However, when you admit the quiet part out loud I feel like you have no rebuttal and are fine with the exploitation in favor of money standpoint, which should bring your other standpoints in question if this is your guiding principle.
        ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
        I disagree in your assertion that sarcasm is an “ad hominem” attack.
ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
Here, so you get it, as I was a bit wrong: https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/finance/def-exp-2025-en.pdf https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/fin... - page 3. Poland spends 4.5% and that is the highest number, the rest are spending much much less. Tell me again how they're spending more???
- trinix912 11mo ago
  By sending stuff and people to Ukraine. But that doesn’t end up in the Nato GDP spendings, because it goes through their governments not NATO.

witheredspirit 11mo ago

The 5% GDP deadline is 2035. The 2% by 2024 was met. Not even the US spends 5% of their GDP on defense. Again as I've stated, it's been criticized as a bad goal to use this metric. In actuality, people who push the narrative that Europe is being bankrolled by the US will never be satisfied by any percentage.

LunaSea 11mo ago

> Just a handful of countries are spending 5% of their GDP on defense And the US is not one of them

ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
The US spends more than the EU combined. If the US would spend 5% of GDP on defense we would all speak english and drive Suburbans.
- LunaSea 11mo ago
  So proportionally it's spending less than certain EU countries
  - ExoticPearTree 11mo ago
    Wow, the mental gymnastics needed to conclude that while the US spends more than the whole EU combined is less than certain EU countries. Just wow.