3 ms·
Given a choice between being “locked in” to a major cloud provider and trusting your business to a randomish little company, you are never going to get a compli
by raw_anon_1111 11mo ago
Given a choice between being “locked in” to a major cloud provider and trusting your business to a randomish little company, you are never going to get a compliance department to go for the latter. “no one ever got fired for choosing AWS”.
This is the API - it’s basically the same for all supported languages
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/code-library/latest/ug/python_3_bedrock-runtime_code_examples.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/code-library/latest/ug/python_3_...
Real companies aren’t concerned about cost as much as working with other real companies, compliance, etc and are comparing cost or opportunities between doing a thing and not doing a thing.
One of my specialties is call centers. Every call deflected by using AI vs talking to a human agent can save from $5 - $15.
Even saving money by allowing your cheaper human agents to handle a problem where they are using AI in the background, can save money. $15 saved can buy a lot of inference.
And the lock in boogeyman is something only geeks care about. Migrations from one provider to another costs so much money at even a medium scale they are hardly ever worth it between the costs, distractions from doing value added work, and risks of regressions and downtime.
- esafak 11mo ago> And the lock in boogeyman is something only geeks care about. Migrations from one provider to another costs so much money... You just gave the definition of lock in.
- raw_anon_1111 11mo agoYou are “locked in” to your infrastructure if you have a bunch of VMs at your colo and you need to move. Do you also suggest that people never use a Colo? I’ve seen it take a year to move a bunch of VMs from a Colo.