4 ms·
That assumes 10 was good and misses 8.1. Also 95/98/me were a different line from NT/2000. It sounds like a good theory but there isn’t much substance to it.
by tonyedgecombe 11mo ago
That assumes 10 was good and misses 8.1.
Also 95/98/me were a different line from NT/2000.
It sounds like a good theory but there isn’t much substance to it.
- Telaneo 11mo ago> That assumes 10 was good and misses 8.1. I find this to be a mostly valid assumption, and 8.1 shouldn't be counted separately from 8 just as Vista SP2 should be counted any differently from Vista (Vista was mostly fine after companies fixed their drivers and Microsoft toned things down a bit. 7 just drove that home and put some necessary distance between itself and Vista). > Also 95/98/me were a different line from NT/2000. I fail to see why this matters.