3 ms·
No, that's not quite correct. It was not giving the impression of being faster, it was faster. https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/11533/why-di
by fransje26 11mo ago
No, that's not quite correct.
It was not giving the impression of being faster, it was faster.
https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/11533/why-did-moving-the-mouse-cursor-cause-windows-95-to-run-more-quickly https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/11533/why...