3 ms·
It's sad that they only compare to open weight models. I feel most users don't care much about OSS/not OSS. The value proposition is the quality of the generati
by lalassu 10mo ago
It's sad that they only compare to open weight models. I feel most users don't care much about OSS/not OSS. The value proposition is the quality of the generation for some use case.
I guess it says a bit about the state of European AI
- para_parolu 10mo agoIt’s not for users but for businesses. There is demand for inhouse use with data privacy. Regular users can’t even run large model due to lack of compute.
- hopelite 10mo agoIt seems to be a reasonable comparison since that is the primary/differentiating characteristic of the model. It’s really common to also and seemingly only ever see the comparison of closed weight/proprietary models in a way that seems to act as if all of the non-American and open weight models don’t even exist. I also think most people do not consider open weights as OSS.
- troyvit 10mo agoGlad I'm not most users. I'm down for 80% of the quality for an open weight model. Hell I've been using Linux for 25 years so I suppose I'm used to not-the-greatest-but-free.