3 ms·
It is. A common argument against using "intellectual property" is how beliefs about tangible property - land and objects - shouldn't be applied to copyright, pa
by eesmith 10mo ago
It is. A common argument against using "intellectual property" is how beliefs about tangible property - land and objects - shouldn't be applied to copyright, patent, etc., so using the term is an implicit acceptance of a false narrative.
- mcny 10mo agoMy assertion is much weaker and therefore much easier to defend — even if you agree with copyright, patents, trademarks, and so on, it is not to out advantage as individuals to support grouping them into one umbrella term as it muddies the waters. Trademark and service marks are a whole different ball game from copyright. To group them together confuses everyone and is therefore only beneficial for those who wish to fish in troubled waters.
- philipallstar 10mo agoNot really - you have IP lawyers who might do all of it.
- mcny 10mo agoIt is good for those lawyers, sure. You can also have people who do both plumbing and electrical work or electrical work and home Ethernet wiring...