15 ms·
Btw the wording says publishers or distributors, so it applies to both porn websites, vpn operators and ISPs, which could technically block vpn ips from connect
by TZubiri 11mo ago
Btw the wording says publishers or distributors, so it applies to both porn websites, vpn operators and ISPs, which could technically block vpn ips from connecting to porn ips. I'm not sure of the implications of "knowingly or intentionally though", I'm just saying they could do that.
The nuances and legal theory are a very deep discussion that the original article ignores completely by focusing on a political agenda.
- zdragnar 11mo agoISPs and search sites are specifically exempted at the end of the assembly version of the bill. I haven't looked at the Senate version but I imagine it's in there too.
- TZubiri 11mo agoOh cool. Shame that I can't access the bill, but that's for the better, it's after all a domestic issue that you guys want to keep domestic. The US network policies were so open that it sometimes felt voyeuristic, in my country we are also implementing national firewalls organically due to malicious traffic, so it seems the world is converging on closing the networks a bit, thanks Russia and China. best of lucks!