That just sounds like a karma farming middle-of-the-road comment that no one actually believes because it's so obviously flawed. What if you want to measure so

That just sounds like a karma farming middle-of-the-road comment that no one actually believes because it's so obviously flawed. What if you want to measure something obviously incapable of being boiled down to a single figure yet you do it anyway, in which case it's OK to create a valueless arbitrary scale and call it fact even though it's clearly balanced in favour of reflecting what you hoped it would? That isn't a valuable endeavour and to analyze and encourage it is just validating absurdity.