I kept reading the article (same old regurgitated takes) to the end and wondered where the actual argument against using Ruby was. Is that it? What a horrific

I kept reading the article (same old regurgitated takes) to the end and wondered where the actual argument against using Ruby was. Is that it? What a horrific piece of journalism. This reads like something a struggling journalist would put out after a few hours with ChatGPT. My guess is the first Ruby codebase he worked on was a particularly bad codebase that didn't conform to Ruby standards.