3 ms·
No point in quitting, reduce workload. If leadership needs to manage folks out make them do the work and collect a paycheck while it happens.
by almost_usual 10mo ago
No point in quitting, reduce workload.
If leadership needs to manage folks out make them do the work and collect a paycheck while it happens.
- Nextgrid 10mo agoYeah I don't get people who quit when RTO or unreasonable changes are made. Quitting makes it easy for them and means they stop paying you now. Letting them fire you means at worst you end up with the same outcome, at best you call their bluff and get paid a few months more (or forever).
- array_key_first 10mo agoYeah but RTO takes real time and money. Sure you can earn a paycheck, but if you're commuting 2 hours a day total, you're still losing those 2 hours until they fire you. And that kind of stinks. And that's assuming you don't need to move. Moving for a job you hate is the worst.
- pavel_lishin 10mo agoI think the suggestion is just ignoring the RTO mandate and continuing to work remote, until they fire you for insubordination.
- wrxd 10mo agoReduce workload, get in a bit later and go home a bit earlier. Avoid attending meetings involving people dialling in from a different office (that’s not in person collaboration, so it’s worthless work. Sorry, I don’t make the rules) and be present at the meeting (keeping the chair warm it’s all it counts after all) while browsing HN in the ones you really cannot get out of it.