3 ms·
Just because your experiences don't match mine does not mean mine are invalid. > Again, you're assuming you understand my condition. I have not, but you've
by godelski 11mo ago
Just because your experiences don't match mine does not mean mine are invalid.
> Again, you're assuming you understand my condition.
I have not, but you've pretty explicitly made assumptions about me.
You'll notice I've made no such explicit claims about you. So maybe there's a difference between what I've assumed about you and what you assume I've assumed about you. Given the inaccurate explicit assumptions you've made about me, I think it is pretty reasonable to question your assumptions. To be explicit, question doesn't mean reject. Suspect doesn't mean invalidate.
- Ygg2 11mo ago> You'll notice I've made no such explicit claims about you That's not quite true. You assumed I'm in a similar position as you: > You're not stuck where you are, so stop acting like that. I explained that our circumstances aren't the same. I'm without wasting huge amounts of resources stuck where I am. > Just because your experiences don't match mine does not mean mine are invalid. It's true, but for a total statement, you need a total consensus; it's how logic works. If I say "All seniors are immortal", you're can invalidate the statements by saying "Djikstra was a senior developer, and he is mortal."