4 ms·
If you thought DeepSeek "just wasn't good," there's a good chance you were running it wrong. For instance, a lot of people thought they were running "DeepSeek"
by CamperBob2 11mo ago
If you thought DeepSeek "just wasn't good," there's a good chance you were running it wrong.
For instance, a lot of people thought they were running "DeepSeek" when they were really running some random distillation on ollama.
- bjourne 11mo agoWDYM? Isn't https://chat.deepseek.com/ https://chat.deepseek.com/ the real DeepSeek?
- CamperBob2 11mo agoGood point, I was assuming the GP was running local for some reason. Hard to argue when it's the official providers who are being compared. I ran the 1.58-bit Unsloth quant locally at the time it came out, and even at such low precision, it was super rare for it to get something wrong that o1 and GPT4 got right. I have never actually used a hosted version of the full DS.