4 ms·
Can someone with more experience in scientific writing comment on > It’s too circuitous and indirect for a scientific report The preceding paragraph does not
by dooglius 10mo ago
Can someone with more experience in scientific writing comment on
> It’s too circuitous and indirect for a scientific report
The preceding paragraph does not seem unreasonable to me--maybe a bit too glib, but nothing that couldn't be touched up.
- paddleon 10mo agoin scientific writing, you need to take 100 articles at 6 pages each and condense them to 1 article of 6 pages And add how your method/insight moves the conversation forward, along with describing your method/insight. The reason why scientific writing can be hard to read from the outside is the 100:1 compression. Decompression of that can require some knowledge of the field. Also, some people are just bad at writing.
- advisedwang 10mo agoThe goal of a paper is to write up the actual discovery, not to tell a story or explain irrelevant background. The steps he wrote there would confuse rather than elucidate the actual discovery.