3 ms·

So he didn't wear the seatbelt and is blaming car manufacturer for him been flung through the windshield.

by GaryBluto 11mo ago

serial_dev 11mo ago
He didn’t wear a seatbelt and is blaming a car manufacturer that the garage burned down the garage, then the house.
- vander_elst 11mo ago
  The car was not really idle, it was driving and fast. It's more like it crashed into the garage and burned it. Btw iirc, even IRL a basic insurance policy does not cover the case where the car in the garage starts a fire and burns down your own house, you have to tick extra boxes to cover that.
venturecruelty 11mo ago
When will Google ever be responsible for the software that they write? Genuinely curious.
- GaryBluto 11mo ago
  When Google software deletes the contents of somebody's D:\ drive without requiring the user to explicitly allow it to. I don't like Google, I'd go as far to say that they've significantly worsened the internet, but this specific case is not the fault of Google.
  - fragmede 11mo ago
    For OpenAI, it's invoked as codex --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox, for Anthropic, it's claude --dangerously-skip-permissions. I don't know what it is for Antigravity, but yeah I'm sorry but I'm blaming the victim here.
    - Rikudou 11mo ago
      Codex also has the shortcut --yolo for that which I find hilarious.
croes 11mo ago
Because the car manufacturers claimed the self driving car would avoid accidents.
- NitpickLawyer 11mo ago
  And yet it didn't. When I installed it, I had 3 options to choose from: Agent always asks to run commands; agent asks on "risky" commands; agent never asks (always run). On the 2nd choice it will run most commands, but ask on rm stuff.
low_tech_love 11mo ago
No, he’s blaming the car manufacturer for turning him (and all of us) into their free crash dummies.
- Dilettante_ 11mo ago
  If you get behind the cockpit of the dangerous new prototype(of your own volition!), it's really up to your own skill level whether you're a crash dummy or the test pilot.
heisenbit 11mo ago
There is a lot of society level knowledge and education around car usage incl. laws requiring prior training. Agents directed by AI are relatively new. It took a lot of targeted technical, law enforcement and educational effort stopping people flying through windshields.

So he didn't wear the seatbelt and is blaming car manufacturer for him been flung through the windshield.

serial_dev 11mo ago

He didn’t wear a seatbelt and is blaming a car manufacturer that the garage burned down the garage, then the house.

vander_elst 11mo ago
The car was not really idle, it was driving and fast. It's more like it crashed into the garage and burned it. Btw iirc, even IRL a basic insurance policy does not cover the case where the car in the garage starts a fire and burns down your own house, you have to tick extra boxes to cover that.

venturecruelty 11mo ago

When will Google ever be responsible for the software that they write? Genuinely curious.

GaryBluto 11mo ago
When Google software deletes the contents of somebody's D:\ drive without requiring the user to explicitly allow it to. I don't like Google, I'd go as far to say that they've significantly worsened the internet, but this specific case is not the fault of Google.
- fragmede 11mo ago
  For OpenAI, it's invoked as codex --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox, for Anthropic, it's claude --dangerously-skip-permissions. I don't know what it is for Antigravity, but yeah I'm sorry but I'm blaming the victim here.
  - Rikudou 11mo ago
    Codex also has the shortcut --yolo for that which I find hilarious.

croes 11mo ago

Because the car manufacturers claimed the self driving car would avoid accidents.

NitpickLawyer 11mo ago
And yet it didn't. When I installed it, I had 3 options to choose from: Agent always asks to run commands; agent asks on "risky" commands; agent never asks (always run). On the 2nd choice it will run most commands, but ask on rm stuff.

low_tech_love 11mo ago

No, he’s blaming the car manufacturer for turning him (and all of us) into their free crash dummies.

Dilettante_ 11mo ago
If you get behind the cockpit of the dangerous new prototype(of your own volition!), it's really up to your own skill level whether you're a crash dummy or the test pilot.

heisenbit 11mo ago

There is a lot of society level knowledge and education around car usage incl. laws requiring prior training. Agents directed by AI are relatively new. It took a lot of targeted technical, law enforcement and educational effort stopping people flying through windshields.