well, the good news is, that the attacker (should there be one) has to be either on the same flight, or have pesistence (bi-directional entry) into that infrast

well, the good news is, that the attacker (should there be one) has to be either on the same flight, or have pesistence (bi-directional entry) into that infrastructure that's a good edge case for not using a hotspot, but at the same time, i've never been on a flight with 'good' internet, but the main question, what to tell the general population about joining untrusted networks, now, you get thousands of feet in the air, you might think it's a tolerable risk to join sleazyJetFreeWiFi, and I would agree, it's unlikely that it's an evil-twin attack, but coming back to giving population level advice, is this kind of nuance useful ? or just fun gg