3 ms·
If you're publishing your code anywhere, it's getting trained on. MS does not restrict themselves to only training on GH-hosted code.
by bloppe 11mo ago
If you're publishing your code anywhere, it's getting trained on. MS does not restrict themselves to only training on GH-hosted code.
- ISSOtm 11mo agoThe point still stands for private repos, and also not making the job easy for them.
- TheRoque 11mo agoThey don't train on private repos, there has been no proof of that anyways
- throwaway290 11mo ago> If you're publishing your code anywhere, it's getting trained on citation needed. first they need to know my code exists... spend time and traffic crawling it because it's sure as hell not going to be hosted on azure... probably get detected and banned.
- dabockster 11mo agoNo citation needed. It should be an assumption and thought as a malicious cybersecurity threat.
- throwaway290 11mo ago> It should be an assumption and thought as a malicious cybersecurity threat. If you believe in absolute cybersecurity for anything you keep online boy I've got news for you. Literally all you can do is make it tougher but it will never be uncrackable. The degree of it depends on how much you can invest and suffer. same here. codeberg makes in tougher so it's a measure.
- bayindirh 11mo agoYet, not restricting themselves to train on permissively licensed code only. The two ends of the spectrum, both source available and copyleft licensed code shouldn't be used for training, but who's listening.