4 ms·
GP's point is that the page attempts to run unnecessary JS and that this is objectionable.
by zahlman 1y ago
GP's point is that the page attempts to run unnecessary JS and that this is objectionable.
- procaryote 1y agoI guess "I want to have javascript enabled but no one to use it" is a hill to die on, but it's pretty exotic
- zahlman 1y ago"I want websites to justify to me that I should let them run JavaScript, and whitelist them for that purpose" is an ordinary and popular take (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/).
- procaryote 11mo agoYeah, but that's different from "this works perfectly well without javascript but I'm still offended for some reason"