>it looks like we've been lied to. I don’t get this conclusion at all, please explain. The article makes estimates without showing their work, then arrives at

>it looks like we've been lied to. I don’t get this conclusion at all, please explain. The article makes estimates without showing their work, then arrives at some probability of a coverup. A coverup where the government releases footage and documents. They just don’t agree that the reports and footage constitute evidence that is compelling.