4 ms·
The deployment may be simple, but at the same time, the Gerrit code review workflow is terrible.
by Kwpolska 11mo ago
The deployment may be simple, but at the same time, the Gerrit code review workflow is terrible.
- zdw 11mo agoI personally find the rebase and stacking commit focused method of integration that Gerrit uses to be easier and cleaner than PR's in GitHub. Having done CI integrations with both, Gerrit's APIs send pre- and post-merge events through the same channel, instead of needing multiple separate listeners like GitHub.
- dsassoli09 11mo agoComing from Github myself, I cannot imagine going back to it after using Gerrit for even just a few days. The workflow in Gerrit really makes a lot of sense, unfortunately its the workflow in GitHub that has screwed up everyone's idea of what code review should look like[1], even by one of GitHub's co-founder own's admission. [1] https://medium.com/@danielesassoli/how-github-taught-the-world-code-reviews-the-wrong-way-f840a072f5be https://medium.com/@danielesassoli/how-github-taught-the-wor...