4 ms·
> On the usability side, the platform has become more and more slow over time The best reason right here.
by 0x696C6961 11mo ago
> On the usability side, the platform has become more and more slow over time
The best reason right here.
- mrj 11mo agoFor real. I've been hearing the interface is slow and requires Javascript for years and never really paid much mind, it worked for me. But lately the page loading has gotten abusively slow. I don't think it can be simply blamed on React because that move was made long before this started. I've taken to loading projects in github.dev for navigating repos so I pay the js tax just once and it's fine for code reading. But navigating PRs and actions is terrible.
- emfrosztovis 11mo agoOff-topic, but as a non-native speaker I’m curious if it’s common to say “more and more slow” as opposed to “slower and slower” (maybe to emphasize the adjective?)
- hahn-kev 11mo agoSlower and slower is more natural to my ear. More and more slow sounds weird.
- bigstrat2003 11mo agoFor me (native speaker), I would say "more slow" is incorrect grammar no matter how you use it, though people will know what you mean. So you should say "slower and slower".
- Brian_K_White 11mo agoBut a writer may use the construct for style reasons. ex: "Vaster than empires, and more slow." I think it's just not actually technically wrong in the first place, merely uncommon because it's a little awkward. What makes it ok is it can be used deliberately to build imagery or to intentionally trigger thought because you have to stop to parse it. What makes it "wrong" is exactly that having to stop to parse it. It's obfuscated meaning to say "increase the decrease". A decrease is a property that may be increased, so it's legal, but you have to stop to puzzle it out rather than know what it means instantly without thought.
- HeckFeck 11mo agoLinguistic decay. First they came for our adverbs, now they're attacking our comparative adjectives.