3 ms·
With all the @ symbols, it reminds me a lot of Lout. Unfortunately, Lout never really took off, but I have fond memories of it. I liked it more than LaTeX, too
by smartmic 11mo ago
With all the @ symbols, it reminds me a lot of Lout.
Unfortunately, Lout never really took off, but I have fond memories of it. I liked it more than LaTeX, too.
[0]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Lout https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Lout
- ubavic 11mo agoThat is something I accidentally discovered. TexInfo also uses @.
- netdoll 11mo agoTexinfo ultimately gets the @ convention from Brian Reid's Scribe[1], as developed at Carnegie Mellon during the late 70s and commercialized by Unilogic[2,3] in the 80s. Coincidentally, there was a close derivative of Scribe called Mint[4], also developed at Carnegie Mellon in the early 80s for the PERQ (an early personal workstation competing in the category of things like the Sun-1 or Lisp Machines). [1] https://bitsavers.org/pdf/cmu/scribe/Scribe_Introductory_Users_Manual_Jul78.pdf https://bitsavers.org/pdf/cmu/scribe/Scribe_Introductory_Use... [2] https://bitsavers.org/pdf/unilogic/Scribe_Document_Production_System_User_Manual_198506.pdf https://bitsavers.org/pdf/unilogic/Scribe_Document_Productio... [3] https://bitsavers.org/pdf/unilogic/Scribe_Pocket_Reference.pdf https://bitsavers.org/pdf/unilogic/Scribe_Pocket_Reference.p... [4] http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cmu/spice/Users_Manual_for_Mint_-_The_Spice_Document_Preparation_System_Apr83.pdf http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cmu/spice/Users_Manual_for_Mint...
- zem 11mo agosame, I used to use it to add PDF generation to my small projects because it was really easy to synthesise and output lout