3 ms·
That’s not a problem that generalizes to the broader population. We don’t really need internet.
by deadbabe 11mo ago
That’s not a problem that generalizes to the broader population. We don’t really need internet.
- awesome_dude 11mo agoScrew the broader population I can speak now dammit!!!!!
- danaris 11mo agoIn other words "disabled people can suck it, because I don't care about their lives or experiences"? We often fall short, but as a society we do try to make sure we're accommodating disabled people when we make big changes in our systems.
- awesome_dude 11mo agoJust FTR - I read them as being facetious
- danaris 11mo agoPoe's Law applies. There are far, far too many people who genuinely think disabled people should just disappear or die for it to be "safe" to be facetious about that without a clear sarcasm indicator.
- cindyllm 11mo ago[dead]
- fn-mote 11mo agoI disagree. People have a need to be heard and understood. That’s half of what we are doing here posting. Many (“not disabled”) people don’t fit in with their local peer group / society. The internet gave them a way to connect with other like-minded individuals. Do I need to give examples? Let’s say: struggling with a rare disease.
- Wowfunhappy 11mo agoBut on the other end you have genocide triggered by Facebook. You can't speak if you're dead. Perhaps some of that violence would have happened anyway. I don't know how it all nets out.