3 ms·
The conference papers were 1%, peer reviews 20%, is there another reason for that big difference than more of the peer reviews being AI generated than the paper
by Jensson 11mo ago
The conference papers were 1%, peer reviews 20%, is there another reason for that big difference than more of the peer reviews being AI generated than the papers themselves?
We can't use this to convict a single reviewer, but we can almost surely say that many reviewers just gave the review work to an AI.
- bjourne 11mo agoPeer reviews are much shorter than papers. A bad review may only be six to eight sentences along the lines of "Math is confusing" and "Too little related work". 20% AI generated seems high if for no other reason than writing a bad review takes very little effort.