4 ms·
Presumes that the surviving humans will not actively disrupt/destroy these automated industries. Which seems highly likely as they will want to scavenge them fo
by SoftTalker 1y ago
Presumes that the surviving humans will not actively disrupt/destroy these automated industries. Which seems highly likely as they will want to scavenge them for anything of value or repurpose them for their own means.
- ben_w 1y agoThere's lots of implicit assumptions or this would be a book, but remember that Musk has a rocket and wants to colonise Mars, and that Mars is so bad that it is currently 100% populated by robots. For the billionaires without rockets, there's also a whole bunch of deserts conveniently filled with lots of silicon. (Or as Mac(Format|World|User) put it sometime in the 90s when they were considering who might bail out Apple and suggested one of the middle east oil barrons, a "silly con").
- SoftTalker 1y agoMusk smokes a lot of weed. We won't have a colony on Mars in his grandshildren's lifetime.
- ben_w 1y agoHis lifetime, I agree unlikely, but also I think that will be short: he's pissed off too many other powerful people and will get the western equivalent of Russian oligarchs "falling out of a window". The economics he talks about are all nonsense. No bank will lend someone $200k for the ticket to go to Mars on the offchance they might be a successful pizza restaraunteur. But like I said, if you're (e.g.) him and you buy your own hype… (His grandkids' lifetimes are another question entirely. Things are changing too fast).