Alternative advice: just test and see what works best for your use case. Totally agreed embeddings are often overkill. However, sometimes they really help. The

Alternative advice: just test and see what works best for your use case. Totally agreed embeddings are often overkill. However, sometimes they really help. The flow is something like: - Iterate over your docs to build eval data: hundreds of pairs of [synthetic query, correct answer]. Focus on content from the docs not general LLM knowledge. - Kick off a few parallel evaluations of different RAG configurations to see what works best for your use case: BM25, Vector, Hybrid. You can do a second pass to tune parameters: embedding model, top k, re-ranking, etc. I build a free system that does all this (synthetic data from docs, evals, test various RAG configs without coding each version). https://docs.kiln.tech/docs/evaluations/evaluate-rag-accuracy-q-and-a-evals https://docs.kiln.tech/docs/evaluations/evaluate-rag-accurac...