4 ms·
The Groklaw story has a link to the full transcript available at http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120923233451725 http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?
by parfe 14y ago
The Groklaw story has a link to the full transcript available at http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120923233451725 http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120923233451725
The PDF is linked as "Exhibit 1" http://www.groklaw.net/pdf4/ApplevSamsung-1991Ex1.pdf http://www.groklaw.net/pdf4/ApplevSamsung-1991Ex1.pdf
How can you think they're not accurately reporting when they link to the actual document? Do you think Groklaw is faking court records?
- tedunangst 14y agoHave you ever clicked a Wikipedia citation? Half they time they don't support, or even contradict, the article's claims. Groklaw isn't Wikipedia, but they idea that an article with citations is infallible is ludicrous. People misrepresent, either intentionally or accidentally, what they've read all the time.
- parfe 14y agoAre you claiming Groklaw fabricates court PDFs? Otherwise,what the F did you just post?
- sbuk 14y agoI don't think they are claiming that at all. They are questioning Groklaw's unabashed partisanship. The thing that I find utterly absurd about these discussion is the partisanship that goes on. The Google and Android faithful are particularly bad in this area. They will call articles that disagree with their world view biased, yet an article that does is undeniable and unquestionable.
- tedunangst 14y agoThe F: Groklaw's summary of the PDF may be less than 100% accurate.