> The code may look "bad" in a vacuum Substitute "buggy" for "bad". The links in the first sentence of the article refer to bugs, which affect end users of the

> The code may look "bad" in a vacuum Substitute "buggy" for "bad". The links in the first sentence of the article refer to bugs, which affect end users of the products. > If you want to reliably produce "good" code then IMO become an artist. This is not about aesthetics but rather about QA.