4 ms·

Interesting that he's named personally. Can any Swedish person explain whether this is the normal process?

• Toerktumlare 11mo ago
  In Sweden, you can charge someone/something two ways. Either you and a company has a disagreement and you sue one or the other and it goes to court. But in this case, ”Utgivarna” which are basically a company/org that represents a lot of media outlets, basically went to the police instead and said ”hey, we think that meta is breaking the Swedish law”. What the police does is that they then investigate and then finds out who is responsible for the company (Mr. Zuck) and then eventually will indict him. Since its Meta that is breaking the law and The Zuck is the one in charge of Meta.
  • hnlmorg 11mo ago
    That makes a lot more sense than the stupid approach like America (and I’m sure other countries too) where they consider the company a person and thus all that actually happens is a fine, that almost always amounts to several orders of magnitude less than the company made for their knowingly wrongdoing
• dietr1ch 11mo ago
  Isn't that ultimately there's people responsible for a company's actions the reason why Mr Burns has a canary that actually owns his company? https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Canary_M._Burns https://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Canary_M._Burns