2 ms·
I'd expect to see this type of fee for non-citizens a lot more. The US is saying a $100 fee for non-citizens to enter national parks will start next year. For t
by dylan604 1y ago
I'd expect to see this type of fee for non-citizens a lot more. The US is saying a $100 fee for non-citizens to enter national parks will start next year. For the Louvre, I'd be willing to give benefit of the doubt that it's a budgetary decision. For the US though with the current administration, there's always a bit of question if the budgetary reason isn't just a mask for the true intention
- philipwhiuk 1y agoFor parks I expect the best approach is to charge for parking. Charging actual entry is tedious.
- kccqzy 1y agoNon-residents not non-citizens. See, the administration still cares about the green card holders and H1B workers, who can still visit the national parks at the lower price.
- rantallion 1y ago> green card holders and H1B workers, who can still visit the national parks at the lower price But only until ICE detain them, right?
- nicbou 1y agoThis was pretty common in Central Asia, and I don't object. It keeps things affordable for locals and available for visitors. I don't mind paying for free museums in other countries, since I'm not subsidising them with my taxes.