3 ms·
Second best, after Apple.
by modeless 11mo ago
Second best, after Apple.
- musicale 11mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualcomm#2015–2024:_NXP,_Broadcom_and_Nuvia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualcomm#2015–2024:_NXP,_Broad...
- eqvinox 11mo agoApple, whose FOSS support is reliant on volunteers reverse engineering their shit? This is much better than that. Not great yet, but much better than that in comparison.
- modeless 11mo agoComparing the chips, not the software, Apple's chips are better than Qualcomm's. I agree Qualcomm's support of open source is better, while still leaving a lot to be desired.
- eqvinox 11mo agoI guess you were specifically replying to the last paragraph; that wasn't clear to me at all. A quote would've helped :) That said, though, Apple can't be best for embedded applications, they're plainly not competing in that space - or can you make e.g. a custom ticket vending machine with an Apple chip?