2 ms·
If i read it right it used multiple samples of itself to verify the aqccuracy, but isnt this problematic?
by gunalx 11mo ago
If i read it right it used multiple samples of itself to verify the aqccuracy, but isnt this problematic?
- zamadatix 11mo agoProblematic in that it's still not formal verification, not problematic as in "it's worse to do this than not".
- viraptor 11mo agoIn what way? Panel of experts approach has been a thing for a while now and it's documented to improve quality.
- gunalx 11mo agoWell problematic because they are using their own verifier as apanem of experts, with their own model trained specifically to satisfy this verifier. On the benchmark runs, they dont mention using human experts to cross validate their scores.
- cubefox 11mo agoI assume they use self-verification only during RL training to provide the reward signal, but not for benchmarks.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]