2 ms·
I’m not sure I agree with this sentiment. You can type something "by hand" and still have almost no voice in it if the incentives push you to flatten it out. A
by coffeecoders 11mo ago
I’m not sure I agree with this sentiment. You can type something "by hand" and still have almost no voice in it if the incentives push you to flatten it out.
A lot of us spent years optimizing for clarity, SEO, professionalism etc. But that did shape how we wrote, maybe even more than our natural cadence. The result wasn’t voice, it was everyone converging on the safe and optimized template.
- ori_b 11mo agoIf you chose to trade your soul to 'incentives', and replace incisive thought with bland SEO and professionalism -- you chose this. Your voice has become the bland language of business.
- O_H_E 11mo agoSo in that case, would someone willing to publish LLM-speak under their name be similarly adopting that "voice". Does that entail that LLMs are not in fact erasing our societal voices, only making it easier to adopt bland-corporate en-mass?
- ori_b 11mo agoThat's a reasonable interpretation. People are choosing to mute their voices, and replace their identity with ChatGPT. It's not a passive loss of voice. Their voice didn't fall off and slip between the couch cushions.