4 ms·

All that I’m saying is that the marketplace is not convinced that IPv6 works better for a local network than IPv4 with NAT and DHCP. It’s more secure and more

All that I’m saying is that the marketplace is not convinced that IPv6 works better for a local network than IPv4 with NAT and DHCP. It’s more secure and more private for users that aren’t security or network engineers. My prosumer $1,000 networking setup isn’t sufficient to run certificates and IPv6 firewall the way you’ve described and I don’t feel qualified to setup what you are suggesting. I can get a $50 router and setup a reasonably secure IPv4 with NAT and DHCP in 15 minutes.

throw0101a 11mo ago
> My prosumer $1,000 networking setup isn’t sufficient to run certificates and IPv6 firewall the way you’ve described and I don’t feel qualified to setup what you are suggesting. I can get a $50 router and setup a reasonably secure IPv4 with NAT and DHCP in 15 minutes. My several-year-old Asus AC68 does IPv6 (my previous ISP had it), (Open)VPNing: * https://www.asus.com/ca-en/support/faq/1008713/ https://www.asus.com/ca-en/support/faq/1008713/ * https://www.asus.com/support/faq/1049180/ https://www.asus.com/support/faq/1049180/ and Let's Encrypt: * https://www.asus.com/us/support/faq/1034294/ https://www.asus.com/us/support/faq/1034294/ Just because you're not qualified does not mean it wouldn't be handy to those who are, but not-high IPv6 adoption is hampering them. Further, some of this would currently have to be done manually (mostly the cert provisioning: IPsec/IKEv2 can otherwise be fairly automated), but if there was more uptake there's no reason it couldn't be more automatic.