4 ms·
It means to be snidely controversial. > Putting aside GitHub’s relationship with ICE… If you actual actually wanted to put that aside, you could have…put it a
by paulddraper 11mo ago
It means to be snidely controversial.
> Putting aside GitHub’s relationship with ICE…
If you actual actually wanted to put that aside, you could have…put it aside.
(Plus it being weird on a substantive basis. Selectively blacklisting specific government agencies…that’s just not a sustainable approach.)
- eviks 11mo agoWhat's unsustainable about it?
- paulddraper 11mo agoI thought this was obvious, but you will be asked to evaluate every government/organization on their morales. So they enforce immigration laws, not enforce it, enforce improperly, do they support abortion, do they support the right side in the Middle East, do they have racist policies, do they not have anti-racist policies, do they limit freedom of speech, do they not limit free speech enough. Every service has rules but are the rules clear and consistent enough that organizations can reliably use the service without worrying they’ll be terminated.
- eviks 11mo ago> you will be asked to evaluate every government/organization on their morales So what? Obviously you won't respond to all the permutations, so can draw only some red lines. > without worrying they’ll be terminated Yes, you can have some principles without increasing these concerns
- paulddraper 11mo ago> Obviously you won't That's what I meant by not scalable/sustainable.