3 ms·
> copy-past[ing] the copyright header but not the code [is] a silly mistake even a human can make Do you mind showing me some examples of that? That seems so i
by DrammBA 11mo ago
> copy-past[ing] the copyright header but not the code [is] a silly mistake even a human can make
Do you mind showing me some examples of that? That seems so implausible to me
Just for reference, here's another example of AI adding phantom contributors and the human just ignoring it or not even noticing: https://github.com/auth0/nextjs-auth0/issues/2432 https://github.com/auth0/nextjs-auth0/issues/2432
- menaerus 11mo ago> Do you mind showing me some examples of that? That seems so implausible to me What's so special about it that I need to show you the example?
- kqr 11mo agoYou are claiming humans copy-and-paste copyright headers without copying the corresponding code. To prove you're correct, you only need to show one (or a few) examples of it happening. To prove you incorrect, someone would have to go through all code in existence to show the absence of the phenomenon. Hence the burden of proof is on you.
- menaerus 11mo agoNo code besides the header was copied so I am asking what is so problematic about it?
- PunchyHamster 11mo agothat was already explained before
- nsagent 11mo agoOh wow. That's just egregious. Considering the widespread use of Auth0, I'm surprised this isn't a bigger story.