They described it in 1988, they predicted it's widespread use for 2000, so they were off by a decade. Still impressive. There needs to be a 'law' for all 'futu

They described it in 1988, they predicted it's widespread use for 2000, so they were off by a decade. Still impressive. There needs to be a 'law' for all 'futurology' and predictions that adjusts the time by a sensible factor after the predictor has justified their original guess. Simply because we're always a tad early on most predictions.