4 ms·
To be clear, I’m not knocking it; I also like to reuse old computers. But it’s incongruous with replacing GitHub, rather that being a “weirdo hobbyist” version
by woodruffw 11mo ago
To be clear, I’m not knocking it; I also like to reuse old computers. But it’s incongruous with replacing GitHub, rather that being a “weirdo hobbyist” version of GitHub.
- jdhendrickson 11mo agoAnd yet the amount of work time I've missed out on from github being down is slightly concerning in retrospect. I imagine the smaller scale of codeberg will actually lead to more uptime despite chaos monkey's best efforts.
- woodruffw 11mo agoThe numbers aren’t looking great so far[1]: they’re not cracking 3 9s on their primary service, and their CI/CD isn’t even cracking 2 9s. And these numbers are much better than when I checked a few days ago! (This should not be read to imply that I think that GitHub’s reliability is acceptable; it clearly isn’t.) [1]: https://status.codeberg.eu/status/codeberg https://status.codeberg.eu/status/codeberg
- franktankbank 11mo agoUptime above 99 I really would only care about the time to get back working. My enterprise experience with Github was multiple days of no work in a year.