2 ms·
No, that would be less holistic. It would be more fragmentary because you're looking at the specific rather than the general.
by onraglanroad 11mo ago
No, that would be less holistic. It would be more fragmentary because you're looking at the specific rather than the general.
- andsoitis 11mo agoThe sentence uses words like “gain”, which means it is stated relative to something else (driving). If we’re going to look at the group, why not also at the individual? We don’t optimize everything for the group. Some things? Yes. All the things? No.
- onraglanroad 11mo agoYup sure, but that's still not what holistic means...