They’re rational actors, though, right? So one can assume that they wouldn’t put a billion dollars of revenue at risk if they didn’t have a plan for replacing t

They’re rational actors, though, right? So one can assume that they wouldn’t put a billion dollars of revenue at risk if they didn’t have a plan for replacing the efforts of those workers — and since they’re a publicly traded company, and this is a material forward-looking statement, there would be SEC penalties if they don’t truly mean what they said about AI replacing the workers. Any rational company would take care not to knowingly lie here without having done enough due diligence to have plausible affirmability of what they claim. (If they’re behaving irrationally, then of course all interpretations are void, but that would invalidate the rationality basis of the comment thread I’m responding to, so I’m not considering that branch of possibilities in this specific thread.)