3 ms·
There is nothing in the linked article that is unsafe for work, nor does anything in the linked article have a sexual connotation. No one owes you a content wa
by krapp 11mo ago
There is nothing in the linked article that is unsafe for work, nor does anything in the linked article have a sexual connotation.
No one owes you a content warning that "this site contains cartoons and that might annoy you."
- alephnerd 11mo ago> No one owes you a content warning In most cases, people do owe content warnings for content that is potentially sexual in nature.
- JoshTriplett 11mo agoThe article contains zero content that necessitates such a warning. Your belief that it is "sexual in nature" is a misinterpretation or incorrect assumption.
- kelseyfrog 11mo agoI don't find anthropomorphized animals to be sexual in nature. I find it a bit strange that it's assumed most people complaining about the blog or suggesting content warnings, on the contrary, do.
- bugbuddy 11mo agoThe complainer is a self-proclaimed policy wonk. I am sure he knows all the corrext policies to enforce include NSFW content policies. Heck, looking at his comment history, I get the impression that he might be a policy wonk in everything.